Skip to content
July 23, 2012 / Admin

Future of Mandatory Arbitration Provisions in Consumer Contracts Uncertain

For years, companies, including credit card and cell phone companies, have included mandatory arbitration provisions in consumer contracts. However, a recent series of events has put the future of forced arbitration into question.

On July 14, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson sued the National Arbitration Forum (NAF), one of the nation’s largest providers of arbitration services for the credit card industry, for consumer fraud, deceptive trade practices and false advertising. The complaint alleged that the company deceived consumers into thinking it was a neutral arbitrator in debt collection when, in reality, NAF worked behind the scenes with credit card companies and other creditors, such as cell phone providers, to write itself into small-print purchase agreements as the sole arbitrator consumers could use if they had problems with creditors. NAF quickly settled the lawsuit, agreeing not to take accept any new cases.

In the aftermath of the NAF lawsuit, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) has announced that it will also stop participating in consumer-debt-collection disputes until new guidelines are established. Additionally, JPMorgan Chase, one of the nation’s largest credit-card issuers, has announced it will no longer submit disputes to arbitration and is evaluating the inclusion of arbitration provisions in its consumer contracts.

As Ashby Jones wrote in a blog at the Wall Street Journal (7/22), “It’s too soon to say, in all likelihood, but we could be in the early stages of an arbitration revolution.” Consumer advocates are hopeful that the settlement reached between the Minnesota Attorney General and NAF, as well as AAA’s withdrawal from the consumer debt collection disputes, will lead to the end of mandatory arbitration. Consumer attorneys have argued that the recent chain of events shows a need for Congress to pass two bills currently before it, the Arbitration Fairness Act and the Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act, which ban forced arbitration. Consumer attorneys have also responded by filing lawsuits seeking to set aside thousands of arbitration awards and judgments in consumer debt cases.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Consumer Advocate Legal Update

Insight and Commentary on Consumer Legal Issues


Insight and Commentary on Individual Rights

Fair Employment Legal Update

Insight and Commentary on Legal Employment Issues

KB News

Legal Updates and News About Khorrami Boucher, LLP

%d bloggers like this: